I’ve been saying for a few years now that the homosexual movement has opened up a can of worms that even most of them aren’t prepared to deal with. In fact, to paraphrase one of the final comments, the entire gay lobby has founded itself on a pardigm that is proving to be false. The “I was born this way” statment has been under attack in academic circles and militant “queer” circles for years–now its spread to popular culture. They have–and we have as a society–sown the wind and we are going to begin reaping more and more of the effects of our social revolutions.
For Some Teen Girls, Sexual Preference Is A Shifting Concept
By Laura Sessions Stepp
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 4, 2004; Page D01
Move over, Ellen DeGeneres, and make way for the younger girls. Way younger, actually, and way different from what most people think of as lesbians.
You can see this new trend on Friday nights outside Union Station, sweethearts from high schools around the Washington area, some locking lips, others hanging out in their tight blue jeans and puffy winter parkas, talking on their cell phones.
You can see them in the hallways of high schools like South Lakes in Reston, Magruder in Rockville or Coolidge in the District. In 2002 at Coolidge, a teacher got so fed up with girls nuzzling each other in class and other public places that he threatened to send any he saw to the principal’s office. He admitted to students that he wouldn’t report boy-girl kisses, setting off a furor among a student body that, the year before, had chosen a lesbian pair as the school’s cutest couple.
These girls pack Ani DiFranco concerts and know tATu lyrics by heart. Their attention is usually directed exclusively at each other but not always: A group of girls at a private school in Northwest Washington charge boys $10 to watch the girls make out in front of them. At one school dance earlier last year, a chaperon had to break up a group of guys circled around two girls kissing, according to other girls who were there.
Maybe the teenage exhibitionists were just yanking guys’ chains, or hoping to prove how sexy they are, or copying Britney and Madonna. But it’s also possible they were enjoying themselves. There’s no way for an outsider to know, for in the protean world of young female sexuality, where all forms of expression are modeled, nothing is certain.
Social scientists say that 5 percent to 7 percent of young people are gay or lesbian, and that teenagers are starting at younger ages to have same-sex sexual experiences: 13 for boys, 15 for girls.
But those figures don’t begin to tell the full story about today’s girls because girls, more often than boys, experiment with their sexuality and resist being placed in any particular group.
Chanda Harris, a junior at High Road Upper School in Beltsville, is one of these girls. She’s standing outside Union Station on a cold Friday night, waiting for her girlfriend and holding three giant helium balloons in celebration of her friend’s birthday.
The girls around her from various high schools — Bladensburg in Maryland, Anacostia, Ballou, Cardozo and Coolidge in the District — converge to hear what she has to say.
She started going out with girls when she was 14, following a breakup with her boyfriend.
“At first I thought going out with a girl was nasty,” she says. “Then I went to a club and did a big flip-flop. I’ve been off and on with girls and guys since then.”
Another girl, a junior at Anacostia High, says her first love was a guy now in the Marines and stationed in North Carolina. She dated Kenny for two years and his picture adorns her bedroom wall.
But now she’s dating a female high school basketball player. “Whoever likes me, I like them,” she says matter-of-factly.
A world away, on the campus of Brown University, Chloe Root, a sophomore with a penchant for bright-colored, funky skirts from secondhand stores, also prefers to keep her options open.
She had her first crush on a girl at age 12 but dated guys, including one with whom she thought she was in love, until her senior year in high school in Ann Arbor, Mich. Then she fell in love with a girl a year behind her in school and has been going out with her ever since.
“If something happened to my relationship with Julie, I could see myself with a boy again,” Root says. “There are some days I notice I’m thinking girls are pretty, and other days I’m thinking there are a lot of good-looking guys at this school.”
So are these girls bisexual? Perhaps. But they prefer descriptions like “gayish,” questioning, even “queer” — an umbrella description so broad, according to Root, that it encompasses straights as well as gays.
Try this on, Mr. and Mrs. America: These girls say they don’t know what they are and don’t need to know. Adolescence and young adulthood is a time for exploration and they should feel free to love a same-sex partner without assuming that is how they’ll spend the rest of their lives.
“I like women only right now,” says Cary Trainor, also a Brown sophomore and a self-defined lesbian since high school. “But who knows where I’ll be in 25 years?”
Even gay rights veterans such as David Shapiro struggle to explain such equivocation.
Shapiro is head of the Edmund Burke School, a private, college-preparatory program in Northwest Washington. In 2002, Burke held a “diversity day” assembly in which students and teachers stood together in a circle. An adult leader took the group through various exercises, and in one of those, participants were asked to move inside the circle if they defined themselves as gay or lesbian.
One female teacher stepped forward, but no students did.
Then the leader called for those who thought of themselves as bisexual — the broadest label offered. Out of the approximately 60 pupils in the group, 15 obliged: 11 girls and four boys.
Shapiro says he was “astounded” at the number of kids who stepped into the bisexual group. As he thought about it, he concluded that “kids today know the difference between behavior and orientation. They say, ‘I may be behaving in this certain way, but I’ll make up my own mind about who I am in my own time.’ ”
He searches for a comparison. “It’s like saying, ‘Mom, Dad, I’m going to take some courses in science but I’m not sure I want to be a doctor.”
A Changing Model
Outside of conservative religious circles, the common understanding for years has been that homosexuality is largely genetic, based on physical attraction, and unchanging. Though an easy model to understand, if not accept, it has a major flaw: It is derived almost exclusively from male subjects.
Recent studies of relationships among women suggest that female homosexuality may be grounded more in social interaction, may present itself as an emotional attraction in addition to or in place of a physical one, and may change over time. Young women also appear to be more open to homosexual relationships than young men are. In one recent national study, more than twice as many girls as boys reported being attracted to the same sex at least once.
Girls may be reacting, in part, to relationships gone sour with guys.
Root has been surprised by the number of gay women she knows who say this. “They say that when you’re with a guy, there is often a feeling that you’re always going to be in a narrow feminine role,” she says. “They say that guys treat them as less capable, overly emotional, or too hungry to be attached.”
The Union Station girls are more blunt about it.
“Girls understand how girls think,” Chanda Harris says. “You can tell a girl, ‘I think I’m falling in love with you’ and she’ll listen. A boy will slough that off, or run away. Besides, the young boys around me are into making money, selling weed and stuff. That’s not what I’m about.”
A Bladensburg High senior, Kateria Rhodes, who says she has dated girls for five years, overhears Harris. “It’s not the sex,” she says. “Girls are there for you emotionally. Sure, they cheat sometimes, but I’ve found [dating girls] is better for me mentally. Actually it’s better on every level.”
She says she has friends who used to date girls and now date guys, and that her mother keeps telling her she’ll change, too.
Harris doesn’t feel that parental pressure: “My mother prefers me to be with girls than guys. She says I’m happier.”
Lisa Diamond, assistant professor of psychology at the University of Utah, is one of a handful of researchers altering the way some people think about girls such as Harris and Root.
“Starting in graduate school, every study I found sampled males only,” she recalls. In 1994, Diamond launched a longitudinal study of women ages 16 to 23 who said they were attracted to other women.
In the eight years she has been following these women, almost two-thirds of them have changed labels. “They’ve gone from unlabeled to bisexual, lesbian to bisexual, lesbian to ‘heterosexual and getting married but may be attracted to women in the future,’ ” she says. Another word she heard was “heteroflexible.”
“The reason one person ended up gay might be very different from another person,” she continues. “One might know at 4, another at 30.”
Diamond’s research, reported in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, among other publications, confirms the experience of Diane Elze, who has counseled gay and lesbian youth for two decades.
“Women who come out as lesbians but lived most of their lives as heterosexuals — does that mean they were always lesbian? I don’t think so,” says Elze, assistant professor of social work at Washington University in St. Louis. “Probably we’re going to find out there are multiple pathways to homosexuality and that could vary by gender.”