First Things: The Drama of Hallowmas

I thought this was an interesting reflection on the worldview that underlies Halloween, and the importance of celebrating All Saints & All Souls days following.  I will admit to having been majorly put off by most contemporary Christian attempts to somehow “deal” with Halloween (Hell houses anyone?) that reveal nothing so much as an ignorance of our own history and deep seated fears of death:

As a friend of mine observed recently, there is something medieval about Halloween. The masks, the running around in the dark, the flicker of candles in pumpkins, the smell of leaves and cold air—all of it feels ancient, even primal, somehow. Despite the now-inevitable preponderance of media-inspired costumes, Halloween seems, in execution, far closer to a Last Judgment scene above a medieval church door, or to a mystery play, than it does to Wal-Mart. To step outside on Halloween dressed as someone—or something—other than yourself is to step into a narrative that acknowledges that the membrane between our workaday, material world and the unseen realm of spirits is far thinner and more permeable than many of us like to think.

This narrative disturbs a lot of people, as the proliferation of church-sponsored “autumn festivals” and “trunk-or-treat” parties suggests. To some of those who worry about it, Halloween is either a thoroughly secular or a thoroughly pagan observance, to be avoided by serious Christians. In the Halloween aisle at Dollar Tree, you’ll certainly be hard-pressed to find anything remotely Christian on offer, unless you count glow-in-the-dark skeletons and black plastic skulls as memento mori designed to remind you that you are not Darth Maul, but dust.

The secular commercialization of Halloween bothers people far less than do its roots in the pagan Celtic festival of Samhain, which the Romans, after the conquest of Britain, eventually conflated with their own Feralia, a feast honoring the dead. When, in the seventh century, Pope Boniface IV instituted the feast of All Saints, to fall on the first of November, the eve of that solemnity coincided with the date of the ancient festival. The addition of the feast of All Souls in the eleventh century completed the three-day Hallowmas, dedicated to the memory of the Christian martyrs and honoring all the faithful departed.

{Read it all}

Update: There’s also a good post up at the Mockingbird Blog relating to Halloween, and responses to it:

What has interested me about Halloween is its intersection with culture, and especially Christianity. Growing up in the church, I’ve seen churches attempt to do all kinds of things with Halloween, from ignoring it completely to throwing elaborate competing “Harvest Festivals.” My favorite Christian/Halloween story comes out of Eden Christian Academy of Pittsburgh, PA (slogan: Pretending People are Perfect since 1983). A dear friend worked as a teacher there, and experienced this first-hand. Presented with the problem of what to do about Halloween one year, the faculty went back and forth: Use it as a teaching moment to communicate about the occult? Embrace what has become a harmless evening of candy-getting rather than a celebration of pagan ritual? Of course not. So afraid were they of dealing with the Halloween “problem,” they did the least productive thing they could have: They cancelled school.

{Read it all}

Sins of the… cousin?

The Last Judgment

.The Last Judgement.

  1. Let them vanish like water that runs off; *
    let them wither like trodden grass.
  2. Let them be like the snail that melts away, *
    like a stillborn child that never sees the sun.
  3. Before they bear fruit, let them be cut down like a brier; *
    like thorns and thistles let them be swept away.
  4. The righteous will be glad when they see the vengeance; *
    they will bathe their feet in the blood of the wicked.
  5. (Psalm 58:7-10)

Yesterday I came across an article in The Age, an Australian Newspaper (HT: Touchstone) about the fact that some folks believe they’ve found 39 living relatives of Adolf Hitler. The majority of these relatives live in Austria while three live in the United States under assumed names (for obvious reasons). Those who live in the US are decedents of Hitler’s uncle, and they fled Germany as refugees from the Nazis.

I bring this up because it is a natural human reaction to want all memory of those who do evil wiped from the face of the earth. Consider the selection above from Psalm 58–obviously such sentiments aren’t new. That impulse, though, can itself be evil. Something that stood out to me in the article from The Age was this bit from the closing section:

”The American relatives have agreed not to have children to extinguish the saga of Hitler and stop living in fear, but have promised to publish a book before they die,”

If these cousins of Hitler don’t want to have children, that’s their business, but from the phrasing of the article it seems that they’re motivated more than a little by a sense of guilt. And for what? Guilt by genetic association? Isn’t that exactly what the Allies fought against? The way the article makes it seem, the family was under pressure not to continue the line, they “agreed not to have children to extinguish the saga of Hitler.” I have news for anyone that thinks such a decision will extinguish the saga of Hitler: it ain’t gonna happen, and it’s absurd and foolish to the extreme to believe it would. What Hitler did, he did because of his own sin–a sin that, by the way is not restricted to a specific genetic line–after all, Mao, Pol Pot and Stalin weren’t relatives of Adolf, but they certainly have more in common with him than do two of his cousins who live as gardeners and one as a psychologist in the United states.

A Cross Shattered Church: Reclaiming the Theological Heart of Preaching

A friend recently mentioned Stanley Hauerwas’ new sermon collection, A Cross Shattered Church to me.  I was taking a look at it tonight, trying to decide if I wanted to order it for myself when I came across this section, which sort of serves to whet the appetite.  What do you think?  It’s next in line for my library shelves I think…

An American evangelical philosopher once asked me if I did not think that hell is best conceived as being hated by God.  I responded by saying that is surely wrong.  If I know I am hated by God, I at least know I exist.  Hell is to be abandonded by God.  Dante surely had it right that at its lowest depths hell is where we are frozen in ice in a manner that those so condemned are unable to see anyone else.

Robert Jenson puts it this way:

What makes death the Lord’s enemy, and fearful for us, is that it separates lovers.  Were my death simply my affair, the old maxim might hold, that since my death will never be part of my experience, I have no need to fear it.  But death will take my loves from me and me from them, and that is the final objective horror, for it decrees emptiness of all human worth, constituted as it is by love.  Having no more being woul dbe no evil were being not mutual.

But being is mutual, because mutuality is the very character of God–Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.  The Father desires friendship with the Son through the agency of the Holy Spirit.  Which means speculation about dying and death that is not governed by Jesus’ cross and resurrection only tempts us to narcissistic fantacies.  What we know is that the crucified Jesus has been raised, making possible our hope that death cannot defeat God’s love for us.  We were created for God’s enjoyment and through the Son’s obedience even to death he has reclaimed us so that we may regard our deaths not as an end but as a beginning.  In short God does not give us explantions that can make our dying something less than death.  He does not give us an explanation; he gives us his Son.

Check it out:

A Cross Shattered Church: Reclaiming the Theological Heart of Preaching

Shared Items from around the web

Here are a few interesting things I ran across in my RSS reader over the past week. Take a look and see what you think:

Bravo to the C of E: The Church of England speaks out against assisted suicide

The Church of England has put of a web site to explain their opposition to assisted suicide.  Here’s a pit of the intro:

Protecting Life – opposing Assisted Suicide
Produced by Mission and Public Affairs, in association with the Communications Office

The Church of England is opposed to any change in the law, or medical practice, to make assisted suicide permissible or acceptable.

Suffering, the Church maintains, must be met with compassion, commitment to high-quality services and effective medication; meeting it by assisted suicide is merely removing it in the crudest way possible.

In its March 2009 paper Assisted Dying/Suicide and Voluntary Euthanasia, the Church acknowledges the complexity of the issues: the compassion that motivates those who seek change equally motivates the Church’s opposition to change.

Principles behind this position

  • Personal autonomy and the protection of life are both important principles that are often complementary but sometimes compete.
  • Personal autonomy must be principled and not without regard to others.
  • Protection of life should take priority when there is a conflict between the two.
  • When protection of life is impossible that does not undermine these principles.
  • Every human being is uniquely and equally valuable, hence human rights are built on the foundation of the ‘right to life’, as is much of the criminal code.
  • An obligation on society, doctors and nurses, to take life or to assist in the taking of life would create a new and unwelcome role for society.

{Read it all}

A great little story

From Peter Leithart we have the following interesting anecdote:

Hippolytus tells the story that Apsethus of Libya trained parrots to fly over North Africa crying out “Apsethus is a god,” and Libyans were taken in and began to offer sacrifices to him.

Then a “clever Greek” caught one of the parrots, and retrained it to cry out: “Apsethus, having caged us, compelled us to say Apsethus is a god.”  Betrayed, the Libyans burned Apsethus at the stake.

All you can say is, that’s some parrot.

Now that’s a great story.

Monday: Day off Link Fest

I thought I would take the opportunity, since this is my day off, to share some of what I’ve been reading around the web.

  • There’s an interesting discussion starting up over at the Theology Forum about N.T. Wright’s latest response to his critics over his views of Paul, Justification etc…  I agree with the author that far too many people want to interpret “reformed” far too narrowly.  I also believe that many of Wright’s critics simply don’t understand his arguments.  Evidently he’s done a fair job of re-presenting them in his latest, Justification: God’s Plan & Paul’s Vision.
  • James Matthew Wilson over at The Front Porch Republic discusses the way in which blogs with never-ending hyperlinks and continually burgeoning opinions result in an attenuated commentary on forgotten primary texts.  He then expresses his gratitude to FPR and its readers.
  • The Creedal Christian offers the following quote from Bishop Kallistos Ware in honor of Trinity Sunday:

    Why should God be a communion of three divine persons, neither less nor more? Here again there can be no logical proof. The threeness of God is something given or revealed to us in Scripture, in the Apostolic Tradition, and in the experience of the saints throughout the centuries. All that we can do is to verify this given fact through our own life of prayer. The Orthodox Way

  • The Art of Manliness provides some advice on how to tie a tie (with instructions on making several different knots).
  • Christianity Today has a wonderful article entitled “Keeping Holy Ground Holy” about a survey suggesting that seekers want anything but churches that don’t look like churches–instead, they would like churches to look like churches.  Imagine that.  (It also notes that one doesn’t need an expensive Gothic sanctuary to make a space feel holy and reverent.  Good news for those of us in congregations that are just starting out.)
  • And in a similar vein, the Archbishop of Canterbury believes Cathedrals are relevant for today.  I agree (indeed, I would say large churches to mega-churches are attempting to approximate the role Cathedrals once had, though with widely varying success.)
  • Mark Tooley of the IRD comments over at the American Spectator on the possibility that the tide of history may not, in fact, be moving in the progressive direction even in mainline churches.  I think he’s partially correct, but we’ll see.
  • Gordon Atkinson discusses his move from PC to Mac.  I have to say that we share the same final straw with windows machines.  Looks like we’re both happy mac users now.
  • Ok, whether you think she’d be a good addition to the Supremes or not, this news about Sotomayor just stinks.  I hope she heals quickly.
  • And finally, take a look at what we’ll be having for supper tonight: Thai fried chicken

From the Front Porch: Only A Man Harrowing Clods

I have found in Wendell Berry, like the late Neil Postman, an insightful critic of contemporary culture and a voice that we ignore at our own peril and to our own impoverishment. The Front Porch Republic has posted the following essay related to Berry’s work and I commend it to you.

Porch

Porch

For most fashionable American intellectuals, the life and work of the poet, novelist, and essayist Wendell Berry represents something of a scandal. Of course, it is understood to be a scandal in its current meaning as a disgrace and most certainly not in its older Christian sense as a temptation. Not only is Berry a writer who lives among the hoi polloi in rural Kentucky instead of cultivating a salon in New York City, but he also spends most of his time farming, or, in the vernacular of contemporary America, doing menial labor.

Further, with apologies to Gilbert and Sullivan, Americans tend to think of everyone who has been begat as either a Republican or a Democrat. Berry’s polemical work, however, is not easily classifiable under either label. In an age when people are leaving or being forced from their farms and when most Americans no longer understand that the phrase res publica refers to something more significant than ‘everyday low prices’, Berry is committed to the old Jeffersonian idea of an agrarian republic comprised of independent, self-reliant citizen-farmers.
Of course, Berry’s agrarianism has been dismissed as anachronistic by those for whom the idea of progress is religious dogma. However, as C.S. Lewis wrote, ‘as to putting the clock back, would you think I was joking if I said that you can put a clock back, and if the clock is wrong it is…a very sensible thing to do?’

Wendell Berry

Wendell Berry

Berry’s The Unsettling of America, which was published in 1977, appears at first glance to be a critique of American agricultural policy, which indeed it is. However, it also articulates a sustained, coherent, and compelling analysis of the fragmentation and alienation of modern American liberal culture, and offers an intimation of both an alternative understanding of culture and community, and a classical conception of human beings, their past, and their purpose.

According to Berry, America has suffered from a split personality since the time of the arrival of the first Europeans. In that European beginning, America was considered a land of economic opportunity, a colony in the modern sense of the term. It was understood as a resource to be exploited by the mother country. As Berry writes, “the first and greatest American revolution…was the coming of people who did not look upon the land as a homeland.” This America, the land of the get-rich-quick scheme, attracted fortune hunters, conquistadors, and assorted other adventurers on the make who treated the land and its inhabitants as a business venture.

At the same time, however, America was also a colony in the classical sense in that it was a place of settlement. This America attracted those who wanted a place to live and a land to cultivate, free from the religious and social strife which plagued Europe in the 17th and 18th centuries. Wallace Stegner, who was Berry’s teacher at Stanford, called the first of these types ‘boomers’ and the second ‘stickers’. A century and a half earlier, Tocqueville noticed this split and attributed it to the difference between royal, proprietary, and merchant colonies and colonies created by compact. However, for Tocqueville, the Revolution and the generally democratic character of the population overcame this dichotomous beginning.

{Read it all}

I highly recommend the following books by Berry:

Continue reading

From New Geography: New Towns and New Lives in the Country

A retired landscape architect and Tennessean has some interesting ideas.  I know from friends and family that the necessity of the two pay-check home is balanced by the cost of living the life-style.  Often the gain is very little indeed, and just enough to keep everything afloat.  Lea lays out the problem pretty clearly, but it’s his suggested solution that’s interesting.  I don’t know whether it has much of a shot though:

Back in the 1950s when I was growing up, pundits worried a lot about automation and the problem of leisure in a post-industrial society. What were the American people going to do once machinery had relieved them of the daily burden of routine labor? Would they paint pictures and write poetry? Armchair intellectuals found it hard to imagine.

It was the age of Ozzie and Harriet, when ordinary working and middle-class families could aspire to a house in the suburbs and a full-time Mom who stays at home with the kids. Today, of course, that popular version of the American dream is a thing of the past, especially the part about a full-time Mom who stays at home with the kids.

Ironically it was washing machines and automatic dishwashers – automation – that brought this idyll to an end. These two labor saving devices made it possible for housewives to go out into the workforce and compete with their husbands. At first they did it because they were bored at home and wanted to earn extra money, if only to help pay for those new household appliances. Gradually, however, it became a matter of necessity as two-paycheck families bid down wages even as they jacked up the price of suburban real estate in areas where the schools were good and the neighborhoods safe. By the time you subtracted the costs of owning a second automobile and using professional child care services, the advantages of that extra paycheck had largely disappeared.

The biggest surprise – to me as well – was that labor-saving technologies do not automatically redound to the benefit of labor. Other things being equal they reduce the demand for labor and hence its price in the marketplace. We saw this happen in the 19th century when modern agricultural machinery forced three-quarters of the population off their farms and into the cities, where they had to compete with immigrants and each other in the new industrial economy. Not until the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1937, which outlawed child labor and established the 40 hour work week, did the world of Ozzie-and-Harriet become a democratic possibility.

But of course Modern Marvels never cease[...]

{Read it all}